The digital piano I currently use is a KAWAI ES105 (which fellow players describe as the “un-neutered” half-pedal version). Today I passed by a music store in Nanjing and, while I was there, tried out four digital pianos:
- ROLAND FP30X
- YAMAHA P-125
- KAWAI CA-30
- ROLAND HP704
1. Overall First Impression: The Difference Is in the Sound, Not the Keyboard
After trying all four, my first takeaway was:
The biggest difference between them isn’t the key feel — it’s the built-in speaker sound.
1) Speaker Sound Comparison
-
YAMAHA P-125 The weakest overall sound (though still within the “usable and listenable” range). The main problem is a clear lack of low end; the sound is on the thin side, but not to the point of being harsh or hard to accept.
-
ROLAND HP704 The best speaker performance. More low-end presence and a fuller sound overall. But honestly, it didn’t deliver the kind of “jaw-dropping” leap in listening experience.
One interesting comparison: If I pit my Sony N3AP monitor headphones plugged into my KAWAI ES105 against the HP704’s built-in speakers, I’d actually lean toward the former.
2. Key Feel: The FP30X Comes Closest to an Upright Piano
1) Overall Conclusion
Of the four:
The ROLAND FP30X has the key feel closest to an upright piano.
But the key difference from a real upright is:
The keys overall feel “on the light side.”
2) On the Feel of “Key Weight”
Personally, I think key weight has a huge impact on how expressive your playing can be — it’s a bit like the concept of “dynamic range” in photography:
- The more realistic and heavier the touch → the easier it is to express the “tension” and “weight” of the music
- An overly light keyboard → easier to play, but with a lower ceiling on expressiveness
When I play on my teacher’s upright, I can clearly feel:
- The “damping” that comes from the wooden mechanical action
- And the genuine boost it gives to musical expression
3) Observations on Japanese vs. European Keyboard Weight
The common claim is:
- European keyboards are heavier
- Japanese keyboards are lighter
I suspect this may be tied to the way European classical music demands “gradations of dynamics” and “expressive tension.”
That said, a lighter keyboard has its advantages too:
- Faster rebound
- Better suited to trills and fast, technical passages
3. Market Logic: Why the FP30X Sells Well
The store’s instructor mentioned:
The FP30X is one of the best-selling models.
The way I understand the reasons:
- The touch is closer to an upright piano
- After a child practices at home, using a real piano in lessons feels less jarring
- You avoid the problem of “the touch feeling off whenever you switch instruments”
From a practical standpoint, this kind of consistency is crucial.
4. Advanced vs. Beginner: Is It Worth Paying Up for Better Touch?
Frankly, for non-professional learners:
Most differences in digital piano touch aren’t easy to perceive clearly.
For example:
- FP30X, P-125, ES105 → limited difference for the average user
- HP704 (PHA-50 action) → more refined, but the improvement mainly shows up at the “professional detail” level
An Analogy
You could think of the differences this way:
- ES105 / P-125: roughly a “90-out-of-100” level
- HP704: roughly a “98-out-of-100” level
The meaning is completely different for different people:
- Ordinary learners: 90 is already plenty
- Professionals / exam candidates / performers: that 98 may be the decisive gap
At even higher tiers (crossover digital pianos, grand piano emulation), professionals will say:
- HP704: “somewhat interesting”
- YAMAHA N1X: now that comes closer to a grand piano
But these differences are often imperceptible or unimportant to the average listener, or even to a beginner’s ear.
5. Impressions of CA-30 vs. HP704
At the store, I was surprised to feel that:
The KAWAI CA-30 can hold its own against the ROLAND HP704 on touch.
The gap between them isn’t as wide as I’d imagined.
But because of time (I’d already taken up a good chunk of the owner’s day), I didn’t go on to a deeper, detailed side-by-side comparison.